short1–3 months
EVIDENCE LEANS BULLISH
Composite+0.37
6 bullish · 1 neutral · 1 bearish
Uncertainty ±0.31 · 8 active
CASH ON TRIAL · VIDEO CASE FILE
I built a bank statement with 8 known problems — 6 subscriptions, 2 annual renewals, and a free trial that quietly becomes $59.99 — then gave the exact same data to ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini and scored what each one caught. All 3 caught the hidden trial. Only 2 flagged the $12 "fee" that isn't a subscription you can cancel. Final score: Claude 10/10 · Gemini 10/10 · ChatGPT 9.5/10. ⚠️ Sample data — a controlled test with a known answer key. Educational demo only, NOT financial advice. Never upload your real bank statements to AI tools. The reusable prompt is pinned in the comments. New experiment weekly. #AI #ChatGPT #Claude #Gemini #personalfinance #budgeting #subscriptions
LIVE COMPANION · CHECKED JUL 12, 11:35 AM PDT
The video is the argument. This live panel is today’s independent rules-based evidence, so it may differ from the conditions discussed when the episode was published.
6 bullish · 1 neutral · 1 bearish
Uncertainty ±0.31 · 8 active
7 bullish · 4 neutral · 1 bearish
Uncertainty ±0.28 · 12 active
1 bullish · 2 neutral · 0 bearish
Uncertainty ±0.18 · 3 active
The bar this evidence must beat: stocks were higher 12 months later in roughly 64% of all months since 1871. A bullish verdict is not a promise.